千文网小编为你整理了多篇相关的《荆棘鸟名著读后感范文》,但愿对你工作学习有帮助,当然你在千文网还可以找到更多《荆棘鸟名著读后感范文》。
这部小说从头至尾都让人的心境处于悲凉的状态。拉夫尔和梅吉注定无法相守,一边是事业,一边是感情,拉夫尔注定要为事业风险一生,而梅吉注定要为守护心中的感情孤苦一生。在事业上,拉夫尔是成功的,为了他的上帝,为了他的信仰,他毅然远离梅吉,可是心中却永远充满了内疚与痛苦,他爱梅吉,可是他又无法冲破世俗的束缚,他心中的思念,怜惜,落寞,纠结,梅吉又何尝不知。梅吉对拉夫尔的爱由始至终从没有改变过,她和一个外表酷似拉夫尔的男人结婚,她把他当成自我的心爱之人,就算得不到拉夫尔,也要和他相似的人结婚,那个男人是个地地道道的守财奴,他享受吃苦受累的过程,他是一个无情,贪婪,自私自利之人,同时也是一个可怜之人。
梅吉借丈夫之名与拉夫尔私通,她最终如愿以偿得到拉夫尔的一部分,她把全部的爱都给了他们的儿子戴恩,他是她的期望,她的动力。没有拉夫尔在身边,她有他们的儿子,即使她与现任丈夫有一个女儿。有了拉夫尔的儿子,她毅然回到德罗海庄园,回到她的亲人们身边,在那里,她能够尽情的享受属于她的时光。
他们的儿子长大了,像拉夫尔一样,戴恩信仰上帝,他不想结婚,他是一个活脱脱的拉夫尔翻版。梅吉把他送到拉夫尔身边,成全他的梦想。明眼人一下就能看出戴恩是拉夫尔的儿子,而拉夫尔却至始至终没有意识到自我有儿子,并且就在他身边。戴恩在希腊救了两个女子却搭上了自我的性命,他还没来得及明白自我最崇拜的人竟然是自我的父亲,就突然离开了人世。
拉夫尔明白了自我有儿子,并且还是戴恩,可是他却永远见不到他了。他永远也无法原谅自我,这就是命运,他忠于上帝又欺骗了上帝,上帝用他的儿子惩罚了他。在戴恩下葬后的几个小时后,他在梅吉的怀里永远的离开了她,他最终忘了梅吉,他没有死于上帝的怀里,在上帝的光辉下,他死于他最爱之人怀里,他解脱了,这份爱太沉重,太绵长,太痛苦,太纠结了。
荆棘鸟的传说:有那么一只鸟儿,它一生只唱一次,那歌声比世上所有一切生灵的歌声都更加优美动听。从离开巢窝的那一刻起,它就在寻找着荆棘树,直到如愿以偿,才歇息下来。然后,它把自我的身体扎进最长,最尖的荆棘上,便在那荒蛮的枝条之间放开了歌喉。在奄奄一息的时刻,它超脱了自身的痛苦,而那歌声竟然使云雀和夜莺都黯然失色。这是一曲无比完美的歌,曲终而命竭。然而,整个世界都在静静地谛听着,上帝也在苍穹中微笑。因为最完美的东西只能用最深痛的巨创来换取……
如果说高中两年学到最多的是什么,大概就是理性以及历史的看待事物。
《荆棘鸟》不只是一本关于爱情的言情小说,更多的守于那遥远而又广袤的生活的展现,守于那段历史的记叙。遥远异国的别样风情始终比那爱情更吸引人。每一页都陌生又异彩纷呈,仿佛自己亲身流连于澳大利雁阔的地界。而更有趣的守于人们,关于那个地方那个年代的男人和女人的想法,关于那时的人们如何看待女人或者是男人,看待他们的爱情的。
生活,一种截然不同却与千万种生活出奇一致的生活。生活总是相似的痛苦又令人乏味,它出其不意而又引人致胜,面对这样的生活,每一个人物都从容不迫的向着某种神秘自然的方向前行着。
而我无法接受的是书中人物面对生活时那种毫无抵抗力,一昧忍受,不断忍受其痛苦却难以用力挣扎的态度,就像荆棘鸟,莫名的陷入命运可悲的轮回无法挣脱改变。无法接受的是人物们对女性的态度和女人们自己一手造就的命运。一个关于女性的悲剧,在文章的开篇就已显现,作者怜悯同时敬佩的着力描绘着她们,栩栩如生。
可是这么多令人冷颤的无奈,它们显得是那么的真实,正是那样的时期那样的环境,历史才有机会造就出那样一批人来,才让这个绝望的悲剧触地生根,叫人怜悯,警醒人们切勿回头。
历史确实总是惊人的相似,但最美好的莫过于当悲剧通过血液一代代相传时,那些异乎寻常的倔强奇迹也在悄然开放,哪怕衷心屈服顺从于命运,哪怕生活局限的令人困于自己的.精神牢笼,也还是有美丽的自由之花孱弱但倔强的成长。从弗兰克失败的尝试到朱丝幸福的结局,以及可以预见未来更为现代更为自由的人的诞生,简直让人在玫瑰灰烬中感到温暖。这也是我喜欢这部小说的原因之一,比起那些更著名更具有启蒙意识,女主角纷纷不同凡世的小说,《荆棘鸟》只是描述了真实广大的女性,以悲剧警醒人们,又在绝望中开出一朵花来,告诉我们,一个全新的自由的,不同以往的伟大时代终于来临了。
这本书更多的让我想到《活着》,对于苦难的承受,几乎相似的命运,窒息般的绝望。只是《荆棘鸟》最后是带着希望以及对田园生活结束的讴歌结尾,《活着》就只是活着了。当然他们都没有机会跳出社会鸿沟,看一眼痛苦的源泉,他们勇敢却无力看透支配其命运的巨大社会,可是大多数生活就是这样啊。小说最后,朱丝终于与雷恩结合,这是幸福圆满的,但在朱丝的故事里她或雷恩拼命挣扎,还是让人感到那窒息般的所谓命运始终无法摆脱。这就是从古至今每个仓皇伟大的时代里的故事,生活里不自由的必然性简直叫人绝望,不过没关系,我们始终抱有希望,正直独立即可谓无所不能。
"This is the best of times and the worst of times." The first sentence of a tale of two cities is quoted numerous times. But I guess the man who knows this sentence and the novel "tale of two cities" tells a story, and does not know why. If you want to understand the original meaning of this sentence, and why you write this classic sentence, it is natural to read the original.
"In short, that era is so similar to todays." This sentence actually explains the two questions of the above classic sentence: why do you say that, and to whom? This is one of the reasons why the novel was born, dickens hope that through such a novel, by describing the French revolution brought disaster to the people to express their own worry, warn the dangerous situation at the same time. A revolutionary history, two cities representing two countries, a few wind and rain people, constitute the main elements of the novel.
Although the tale of a tale of two cities is a classic novel, it is considered to be the authors view of history because it explicitly states that the revolutionary background is the French revolution. And that is the focus of countless controversies over the novel. In the novel, dickens showed the cruelty of the aristocracy, but also showed the irrational destruction of the revolutionary masses. The revolution, he argued, was a kind of oppression that replaced another kind of oppression, and a bloodbath that was a direct and heavy one instead of another. A series of depictions of the storming of the bastille and of the mob - bloody, brutal, cunning, malevolent - is the most striking aspect of the novel.
Dickens has devoted a great deal of ink to the evil of the mob, showing his abhorrence of the mob and, in a certain degree, the hatred of the revolution. Of course, as a humanist, dickens also points out the cure for the world: love. This kind of love, embodied in the novel includes family love, love, friendship and such private feelings, also includes the abandonment of the aristocracy, the salvation of the kind of fraternity. Among them, the most brilliant is the description of cartons love.
I like carton very much. In fact, carton was the embodiment of dickens, and dickens was the first to think of the man and the spirit of his body to conceive the novel. So, what was carton like? The novel describes: "the sun is sad and mournful, and the rising of sorrow, the sight unseen, is nothing worse than this man. He is talented and emotional, but he has no opportunity to show his talent. He cant do anything, and he cant make his own happiness. He knew his problem, but he resigned himself to his fate, and he wasted all his time, year after year.
It is a young man who has lost his talent and youth. The novel does not appear to have been explained, since he has appeared in the first place, and has not written much about his family background. Personally, this man represents dickens himself, so he does not need to describe too much - the fall of carton comes from his frustration with the deteriorating society. He went up to the guillotine and said, "I see the evil of this age, and the evil of the former times, which has caused this evil, and I have gradually died for my SINS."
Pessimists - caton, was rejected by his friends meet with difficulties, in the love of a womans husband is about to be guillotined in when he suddenly appeared, be dont save the situation, do price with his own life, in the Nick of time to make a replace plan to rescue his beloved womans husband.
It is not the love of Christ, who has redeemed his sin and died. In fact, in the novel, carton did indeed say, in the biblical tone, "the resurrection is in me, the life is in me, and the man who believes in me, though dead, will rise again. And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. This is the medicine that dickens prescribed for "the worst of times", but it is, after all, an ideal. It is said that the tale of a tale of two cities is an immortal work without Sidney. The existence and behavior of carton, the novel loses its value and brilliance.
很久没有通宵达旦的看书了。
第一次似乎是高中时代看《青春之歌》,为林在卢离世后看到生前的信而心怀激荡,但没有泪水;后来读续集的《芳菲之歌》和《英华之歌》,觉得大刹风景。读研前曾经通宵读过《骨指》,恐怖得难以入睡。
今晚,是不惑之年的第一次,为一本书难以入眠。
《荆棘鸟》,大学时唯一接到丘比特之剑的人推荐的书,可惜,愚的我,既忽视了曾经的丘比特之剑,也忽略了《荆棘鸟》一书。在独身的不惑,补读《荆棘鸟》,却不知曾经的剑在何方?
于是,阅读便多了些人生的苍凉。
而真正的结局,却是如此的撕心裂肺。只是,年龄已不再有曾经的心潮激荡。
我老了,然而,这是很多年前的事了。
A tale of two cities is written by Charles Dickens, one of Americas greatest writers. He was born in 1812 in Portsmouth and died in 1870. He was born poor, but soon after his unhappy childhood he became rich and successful. He also wrote many famous novels, such as oliver twist. Great expectations and so on.
The tale of a tale of two cities was written in 1775. In a room above a tavern in Paris, there was a white-haired man who was busy making shoes. He had been a prisoner in the bastille for 18 years. Now he was a free man, yet he did not know his name, and he did not eat his friends. All he knew was that he had to keep making shoes.
On a bus to Paris, she sat on lucie, the daughter she had never seen before. Lucie brought her father back to London, and, with the love and care of her daughter, he forgot about the past and learned to live as a free man.
Yet during the stormy years of the French revolution, the past was neither lost nor forgotten. And so soon the danger secretly brought lucie and the people she loved back to Paris... There was the horrible death machine - the guillotine waiting for the enemies of France.
The protagonist here is clearly debunking the darkness and corruption of the society at that time. One original for the 18 years as a prisoner, what also dont remember the man, then is he had never met the daughter "back to London, started a free life, but in the end, his daughter and she loved ones were returned to Paris of darkness, by the French enemies killed!
上帝创造人类,人类衍生出善与恶,上帝同时放出潘多拉魔盒使人受到多元的挑战,正如他虽清楚告诉亚当和夏娃别偷吃禁果,但仍很仁慈的留给人以选择权一样,人在无法选择或面临多种选择时必然会犯许多错误,进而修正,所以上帝拯救的应当是行动中的人,以到达一种相对完美的境界。
人在完善自我之时,也即上帝对人格,生命底蕴的内在转化。古人云:“真知即所以为行,不行不是谓之知。”这样说来,应尽天道无余常与善人,然而当一种追求与神冥冥相对时,人的生命可是是自然界的一根芦苇,任何来自自然界的渺小力量都能使其归于毁灭。麦吉,拉尔夫就是如此,拉尔夫很象《巴黎圣母院》中的那个牧师,不一样的只是形式,其情之专感人肺腑,美丽的东西可是是瞬间的灿烂,抓住一个足以乐终身。相比而言,拉尔夫是幸运的,神的力量还没有完全扼住其情感的咽喉,痛苦的理性最终让位于纯真的本能,从而也就抓住了永恒的瞬间,他死了——在爱人的怀中,留下了凄楚的麦吉。幸福总是伴随着多倍的痛苦,美总是短暂到让人来不及为之驻足,痛并欢乐着,亦或乐并痛苦着。福兮,祸兮?
一切束缚人的本能的宗教或法则总会在人的持久的沉默后的爆发中被突破,牧师和和尚相似。无独有偶,《巴黎圣母院》中也着力刻画牧师受着相思煎熬后的种种痛苦乃至扭曲的心灵,难道仅仅是巧合吗?生理的欲望只能顺势引导,因地制宜,才能使肉体的凡俗升华到精神的神圣。
由此种种,经典的感情总是以杯具而告终的。《乱世佳人》,《呼啸山庄》,《简.爱》,《红楼梦》等著作能流芳百世,杯具的意义在于把有价值的东西撕毁给人看,杯具作家的灵性在于他以大悲的眼光透过现象看本质,由一而衍生出二乃至无数,将个体的悲升华到整个人类的一种发自脊髓深处的寒气来,正因为如此,他本人倒是往往乐观的,因为他悲在质量而非数量,在本质而非现象本身。当这种悲超越了人的承受力的时候,喜剧作为一种替代品便出台了。
真正的杯具是一种微妙的形式,它绝非是原本美的东西结合后又因彼此的冲突而告终的那种,而是当好不容易结合后却时常因外在压力或内心谴责生活在如履薄冰的思想境地中,最终这种因环境或某种特殊原因的压力而在实际上或抽象意义上分开,如罗密欧与朱丽叶,白瑞德与斯嘉丽,主人公背负着或沉重或戏谑等特性,在上帝的微笑中悄然而去,留给读者无尽的感伤,同时却使人心灵得以净化。仅有把一种感情放在记忆中或想象中去品味,同时使之在一种被呵护的状态中活在当下,才是最好的,物质的或肉体接触如果稍有不当都是对它的亵渎。与人共享青春,但愿独自苍老是一件很浪漫的事,感情也一样,如果麦吉和拉尔夫没有结合,杯具的味道就会冲淡,与人在逝世前仍对他们所憧憬的保留一份绝对的神秘,的确带有淡淡的紫丁,般的哀伤!遗憾的是酸涩的,美却是令人愉悦的,这就是杯具的魅力。
拉尔夫爱上麦吉源于一种直觉,然而这种感觉却支配着他的一举一动,很难说请一见钟情和理智思考后的真情谁更好,但犹如佛教中的密宗禅宗一样,终能修成正果。
感激文学殿堂里杯具的独特贡献,主人公以其悲壮,作家以其刀笔,直入人的魂魄深处,唤醒人性沉睡的或正要入睡的心底最柔软的部分,从而有了参照物以修正自我,润物细无声的滋养着人的荒芜或即将失去的精神家园,使人高雅起来,杯具的高尚正在于以其悲成全人类之美!
——至拉尔夫死在麦吉的怀中及文中对战后归来的其弟兄的描述及人物的死亡安排,作者人性化及个性化色彩呼之欲出,跃然纸上,感动之余遂乱写下自我的一点感受,时常感动,学会感恩,让自我成为“人”!
推荐专题: 荆棘鸟读后感英文